Skip to content
Wellsprings
christian-ecclesiology-sacramentsfeatured in 14 works

Papal Primacy

Does Peter's chair in Rome hold authority over the whole Church?

Papal primacy is the claim that the bishop of Rome holds a primacy of authority over the universal Church, appealing to Matthew 16:18 and early witnesses like Clement of Rome and Leo the Great. It remains a chief church-dividing issue: Catholics affirm universal jurisdiction, the Orthodox accept a primacy of honor but reject universal jurisdiction, and Protestants reject the office itself.

How it traveled

  1. The Treatises of Cyprian.
    Carthage · 258
    explains
  2. The Church History of Eusebius
    Caesarea · 339
    explains
  3. The Second Ecumenical Council: The First Council of Constantinople
    Constantinople (Istanbul) · 381
    challenges
  4. The Letters of St. Jerome
    Bethlehem · 420
    explains
  5. The Third Ecumenical Council: The Council of Ephesus
    Ephesus · 431
    explains
  6. The Ecclesiastical History of Sozomen
    Constantinople (Istanbul) · 450
    explains
  7. The Fourth Ecumenical Council. The Council of Chalcedon
    Chalcedon · 451
    explains
  8. The Letters and Sermons of Leo the Great
    Rome · 461
    explains
  9. The Fifth Ecumenical Council. The Second Council of Constantinople
    Constantinople (Istanbul) · 553
    explains
  10. The Book of Pastoral Rule, and Selected Epistles, of Gregory the Great
    Rome · 604
    explains
  11. Selected Epistles of Gregory the Great
    Rome · 604
    explains
  12. The Canons of the Synods of Sardica, Carthage, Constantinople, and Carthage Under St. Cyprian, Which Canons Were Received by the Council in Trullo and Ratified by II. Nice
    Constantinople (Istanbul) · 692
    explains
  13. Book Fourth. of the Holy Catholic Church
    Geneva · 1564
    applies
  14. A History of the Work of Redemption
    Northampton, Massachusetts · 1758
    explains

Key passages(20)

OF THE PRIMACY OF THE ROMISH SEE. The divisions of this chapter are,—I. Question stated, and an argument for the primacy of the Roman Pontiff drawn from the Old Testament refuted, sec. 1, 2. II. Repl

Tap to expand

OF THE JURISDICTION OF THE CHURCH, AND THE ABUSES OF IT, AS EXEMPLIFIED IN THE PAPACY. This chapter may be conveniently comprehended under two heads,—I. Ecclesiastical jurisdiction, its necessity, or

Tap to expand

8. Although we have not said all that might here be adduced, and even what has been said is only briefly glanced at, enough, I trust, has been said to leave no man in doubt that the spiritual power on

Tap to expand

11. At length the Roman Pontiff, not content with moderate districts, laid hands first on kingdoms, and thereafter on empire. And that he may on some pretext or other retain possession, secured by mer

Tap to expand

15. To jurisdiction is annexed the immunity claimed by the Romish clergy. They deem it unworthy of them to answer before a civil judge in personal causes; and consider both the liberty and dignity of

Tap to expand

9. I come to the seculars, some of whom are (as they speak) beneficiaries; that is, have offices by which they are maintained, while others let out their services, day by day, to chant or say masses,

Tap to expand

4. How unbecomingly they wrest the passages of binding and loosing I have elsewhere glanced at, and will in a short time more fully explain. It may now be worth while merely to see what they can extra

Tap to expand

12. Let us see, however, how admirably they reason. Peter, they say, had the first place among the apostles; therefore, the church in which he sat ought to have the privilege. But where did he first s

Tap to expand

114 D114 In Paul’s second epistle to Timothy (the last of the Pauline epistles, dated A.D. 67), he states that at his first defense no man stood with him, but that all forsook him (2 Tim. 4:17). Where

Tap to expand

17. But since on this our opponents would rear up a primacy and supreme authority over other churches, they, as I have said, greatly err. That this may better appear, I will first briefly show what th

Tap to expand

29. But I have no pleasure in this absurd mode of disputation, and therefore return to the point from which I digressed. To fix down Christ and the Holy Spirit and the Church to a particular spot, so

Tap to expand

1. In regard to the antiquity of the primacy of the Roman See, there is nothing in favour of its establishment more ancient than the decree of the Council of Nice, by which the first place among the P

Tap to expand

4. The controversy concerning the title of universal bishop arose at length in the time of Gregory, and was occasioned by the ambition of John of Constantinople. For he wished to make himself universa

Tap to expand

6. Be this as it may, let us consider what right or authority the Roman See then possessed. Ecclesiastical power may be reduced to four heads—viz. ordination of bishops, calling of councils, hearing o

Tap to expand

9. The fourth remaining species of power is that of hearing appeals. It is evident that the supreme power belongs to him to whose tribunal appeals are made. Many had repeatedly appealed to the Roman P

Tap to expand

12. In the time of Gregory, that ancient rule was greatly changed. For when the empire was convulsed and torn, when France and Spain were suffering from the many disasters which they ever and anon rec

Tap to expand

16. But shortly after, John, who, in the time of Gregory, presided over the church of Constantinople, went so far as to say that he was universal Patriarch. Here Gregory, that he might not be wanting

Tap to expand

21. I will not treat with them on the strictest terms. In opposition to their great insolence, some would quote the language which Cyprian used to the bishops in the council over which he presided: “N

Tap to expand

As to the See of Prima Justiniana, the Metropolitan jurisdiction assigned to it by the Emperor Justinian, and the vicariate jurisdiction that had been transferred to it from Thessalonica by the popes,

Tap to expand

Very high

Still it is very distressing, and hard to be borne with patience, that my aforesaid brother and fellow-bishop, despising all others, should attempt to be called sole bishop. But in this pride of his w

Tap to expand