The Regimes
The Greek scheme that sorts every government into a few basic types — and warns how each can rot into its corrupt twin.
Greek thinkers classified constitutions (politeiai) by who rules and in whose interest. The famous typology first appears as a debate in Herodotus (5th c. BCE), is refined by Plato, and reaches its classic form in Aristotle's Politics: rule by one, few, or many, each with a healthy version (monarchy, aristocracy, polity) and a corrupt counterpart (tyranny, oligarchy, democracy). Polybius later wove these into a cyclical theory of how regimes rise and decay, shaping political analysis for two thousand years.
How it traveled
- HistoriesThurii (Magna Graecia) · -425explains
- History of the Peloponnesian WarAthens · -400explains
- Defense Against a Charge of Subverting the DemocracyAthens · -380explains
- RepublicAthens · -375explains
- StatesmanAthens · -358explains
- AreopagiticusAthens · -355explains
- HellenicaAthens · -354explains
- MemorabiliaAthens · -354explains
- For the Liberty of the RhodiansAthens · -351explains
- LawsAthens · -348explains
- LettersAthens · -348explains
- PanathenaicusAthens · -339explains
- Nicocles or the CypriansAthens · -338explains
- RhetoricChalcis · -335explains
- Res Publica AtheniensiumChalcis · -325explains
- PoliticsChalcis · -322explains
- Nicomachean EthicsChalcis · -322explains
- Divisiones AristoteleaeChalcis · -322explains
- HistoriesMegalopolis · -118explains
- De RepublicaFormiae · -54explains
- Ab urbe conditaPadua · -27explains
- GeographyAmaseia · 24explains
- CaesarChaeronea · 120explains
- Apophthegmata LaconicaChaeronea · 120explains
- De unius in republica dominatione, populari statu, et paucorum imperioChaeronea · 120explains
- Civil WarsAlexandria · 165explains
- Description of Greece— · 180explains
- Vitae philosophorum— · 240explains
- Abarbanel on TorahNaples · 1505critique
- Historia RomanaRomeexplains
- Historical LibrarySyracuse (Sicily)explains
- Jewish Antiquities—explains
- The Jewish War—explains
- Epitome HistoriarumConstantinople (Istanbul)explains
- Antiquitates RomanaeRomeexplains
- OrationesPrusaexplains
- Breviarium historiae romanaeConstantinople (Istanbul)explains
Key passages(20)
Abarbanel on Torah · Don Isaac Abarbanel · 1483 CE
ההקדמה האחת הנה ראוי שנדע אם המלך הוא דבר הכרחי ומחוייב בעם חיוב עצמי או אפשר בלתו, וכבר חשבו הפלוסופים שהוא כן, ושרות המלך לעם בקבוץ המדיני כיחס הלב בגוף הבעל חי שיש לו לב, וכיחס הסבה הראשונה אל העול
Tap to expand
Abarbanel on Torah · Don Isaac Abarbanel · 1483 CE
ההקדמה השנית היא שאף שנודה היות המלך דבר מועיל והכרחי בעם לתקן הקבוץ המדיני ושמירתו, מה שהוא, הנה בעם ישראל איננו כן כי אינו צריך ולא הכרחי להם. וביאור זה הוא שצורך המלכים בעם הנה יוכלל בג' ענינים, הא
Tap to expand
In Aristotelis artem rhetoricam commentarium · Anonymi in Aristotelis Artem Rhetoricam
Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle
Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle
The best of these constitutions is Kingship, and the worst Timocracy. The perversion of Kingship is Tyranny. Both are monarchies, but there is a very wide difference between them: a tyrant studies his
Tap to expand
When a change of constitution takes place, Kingship passes into Tyranny, because Tyranny is the bad form of monarchy, so that a bad king becomes a tyrant. Aristocracy passes into Oligarchy owing to ba
Tap to expand
but they can best excel in military valor, for this is found with numbers; and therefore with this form of constitution the class that fights for the state in war is the most powerful, and it is those
Tap to expand
Now it is at all events easy to discern that kingship includes several kinds, and that the mode of government is not the same in all. For the kingship in the Spartan constitution, which is held to be
Tap to expand
These monarchies therefore now and in the past are of the nature of tyrannies because they are autocratic, but of the nature of kingships because they are elective and rule over willing subjects. A fo
Tap to expand
The majority, is it not obvious? But it will be said that they will split up into factions, whereas with a single ruler this cannot happen. But against this must perhaps be set the fact that they are
Tap to expand
but the proper course is to bring forward an organization of such a sort that men will easily be persuaded and be able in the existing circumstances to take part in it, since to reform a constitution
Tap to expand
or be based on the outstanding superiority of the man who is king; so that tyranny being the worst form must be the one farthest removed from constitutional government, and oligarchy must be the secon
Tap to expand
another is when the magistracies are filled from high assessments and the magistrates themselves elect to fill vacancies (so that if they do so from all the citizens of this assessment, this appears r
Tap to expand
It remained for us to speak of tyranny, not because there is much that can be said about it, but in order that it may receive its part in our inquiry, since we rank this also as one among the kinds of
Tap to expand
and these govern in accordance with law as in the former case, this is oligarchical; and also when the deliberative officials are elected by co-optation, and when the office is hereditary and has supr
Tap to expand
And the things that happen about royal governments and tyrannies are almost similar to those that have been narrated about constitutional governments. For royal government corresponds with aristocracy
Tap to expand
one when those who participate in it quarrel, and another when the kings try to administer the government too tyrannically, claiming to exercise sovereignty in more things and contrary to the law. Roy
Tap to expand
for these modes when coupled together make the constitutions overlap, so as to produce oligarchical aristocracies and republics inclining towards democracy. I refer to the combinations which ought to
Tap to expand