Skip to content
Wellsprings
greek-ethicsfeatured in 40 works

The Good

That at which all things aim — for Plato a transcendent Form lighting up all reality, for Aristotle the goal that completes a human life.

The Good (to agathon) is the supreme object of value and the ultimate aim of action. Plato (4th c. BCE) made the Form of the Good the highest of all Forms — the source of being and intelligibility, likened in the Republic to the sun. Aristotle rejected any single transcendent Good in favor of the human good, eudaimonia, achieved through virtuous activity. The contrast between a transcendent Good and a this-worldly human good runs through all later philosophy and theology.

How it traveled

  1. Republic
    Athens · -375
    explains
  2. Laws
    Athens · -348
    explains
  3. Gorgias
    Athens · -348
    redefines
  4. Rhetoric
    Chalcis · -335
    explains
  5. Nicomachean Ethics
    Chalcis · -322
    explains
  6. Eudemian Ethics
    Chalcis · -322
    explains
  7. de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum
    Formiae · -43
    explains
  8. Discourses
    Nicopolis · 108
    redefines
  9. Ad Se Ipsum
    Vindobona (Vienna) · 170
    explains
  10. Deipnosophistae
    Naucratis · 230
    explains
  11. Vitae philosophorum
    · 240
    explains
  12. Enneades
    Rome · 270
    explains
  13. Midrash Tanchuma Buber
    Tiberias · 600
  14. Duties of the Heart
    Zaragoza (Saragossa) · 1080
  15. Guide for the Perplexed
    Cairo · 1190
  16. Yalkut Shimoni on Nach
    Tiberias · 1250
  17. Yalkut Shimoni on Torah
    Tiberias · 1250
  18. Sha'arei Orah
    Guadalajara · 1260
  19. Zohar
    Guadalajara · 1280
  20. Zohar Chadash
    Guadalajara · 1290
  21. Sefer HaIkkarim
    Soria · 1425
  22. Akeidat Yitzchak
    Tarragona · 1490
    synthesis
  23. Abarbanel on Torah
    Naples · 1505
  24. Avodat HaKodesh (Ibn Gabbai)
    Cairo · 1523
  25. Ketem Paz on Zohar
    Tzfat · 1561
  26. Reshit Chokhmah
    Tzfat · 1575
  27. Ohr HaChammah on Zohar
    Tzfat · 1620
  28. Mikdash Melekh, RaMaZ Commentary on Zohar
    Tzfat · 1680
  29. Likutei Moharan
    Breslov (Ukraine) · 1802
  30. Maor VaShemesh
    Krakow (Cracow) · 1817
  31. Sha'arei Avodah
    Strashelye · 1820
  32. Likutei Halakhot
    Breslov (Ukraine) · 1840
  33. Malbim on Proverbs
    Bucharest · 1860
  34. Malbim on Psalms
    Bucharest · 1860
  35. Malbim on Isaiah
    Bucharest · 1860
  36. Epistulae
    redefines
  37. Fragmenta Moralia
    Athens
    explains
  38. Historia Romana
    Rome
    explains
  39. Legum Allegoriarum Libri I-III
    explains
  40. De Specialibus Legibus (lib. i‑iv)
    explains

Key passages(20)

Akeidat Yitzchak · Yitzchak Aramah · 1455 CE

Very high

*תוכן כוונתו, כי בני אדם יתחלקו לשתי מחלקות, האחת אשר כל אנשיה יכונו בפעולותיהם להשיג תכלית ידוע אשר יבחרו להם, והם מתפרדים לג' ראשים. הראש האחד יפנה רק אל הטוב המוחלט והאמיתי הנרצה בעיני ה'. ואנשיי מ

Tap to expand

Akeidat Yitzchak · Yitzchak Aramah · 1455 CE

Very high

והנה להיות הענין כאשר נתישב. מהיות הכרת התכלית והתועלת בפעולות הכרחי לשיתנועע האדם אליהם. היה מהשתדלות החוקר לתקור על מהות האושר ולשבח ענינו ולפרסמו לשומו לנס נכר ומבואר לכל. יראו רבים וישתדלו בכל עוז

Tap to expand

Akeidat Yitzchak · Yitzchak Aramah · 1455 CE

Very high

*תוכן דעתו הוא כי ב' מיני הצלחות יש לאדם, הא' הצלחה מוסרית הנקראת בל"הק "דבוק בה" כמא"הכ "ואתם הדבקים בה'" וכו' והב' הצלחה גופנית, ולזה יצטרכו שלש ענינים, הא' הוא בעצמותו של אדם ר"ל בריאות גופו וכוחות

Tap to expand

Liber de philosophorum sectis (epitome ap. Stobaeum) · Arius Didymus

Very high

Liber de philosophorum sectis (epitome ap. Stobaeum) · Arius Didymus

Very high

Handbook of Platonism · Alcinous

Very high

Ἠθικὰ προβλήματα [Sp.] · Alexander of Aphrodisias

Very high

Ἠθικὰ προβλήματα [Sp.] · Alexander of Aphrodisias

Very high

In Porphyrii Isagogen Sive Quinque Voces · Ammonius

Very high

In Aristotelis artem rhetoricam commentarium · Anonymi in Aristotelis Artem Rhetoricam

Very high

Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle

Very high

Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle

Very high

Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle

Very high

Divisiones Aristoteleae · Pseudo-Aristotle

Very high

Eudemian Ethics · Aristotle

Very high

But good has many meanings, and there is a part of it that is beautiful, and one form of it is practicable but another is not. The sort of good that is practicable is that which is an object aimed at,

Tap to expand

Nicomachean Ethics · Aristotle

Very high

Every art and every investigation, and likewise every practical pursuit or undertaking, seems to aim at some good: hence it has been well said that the Good is That at which all things aim.

Tap to expand

Nicomachean Ethics · Aristotle

Very high

Men of refinement, on the other hand, and men of action think that the Good is honor—for this may be said to be the end of the Life of Politics. But honor after all seems too superficial to be the Goo

Tap to expand

Nicomachean Ethics · Aristotle

Very high

But in what sense then are different things called good? For they do not seem to be a case of things that bear the same name merely by chance. Possibly things are called good in virtue of being derive

Tap to expand

Nicomachean Ethics · Aristotle

Very high

If therefore neither of these views is satisfactory, perhaps we should say that what is wished for in the true and unqualified sense is the good, but that what appears good to each person is wished fo

Tap to expand

Very high

Let us assume good to be whatever is desirable for its own sake, or for the sake of which we choose something else; that which is the aim of all things, or of all things that possess sensation or reas

Tap to expand